Wednesday, October 17, 2012

Conclusion

It is again simply important to note, in conclusion, that Homer's The Iliad and Wolfgang Petersen's Troy were written for different audiences, different time periods and different cultures. It is for this reason that mythology is excluded in the latter and the empathy element is excluded in the former.

Each one is entertaining and appealing when experienced by people of the intended audience.


Finally, I must acknowledge the limitation of sources contributing to these blog posts. The Iliad was written thousands of years ago ago in a different language; time may have taken its toll on the poem's validity, and the language barrier certainly will have (it is possible that the some translations of passages of The Iliad are disputed, and that poor translations have had a negative impact on my investigation). The specific culture for which the story was dreamed up was different to ours, and, in this way, translators may have had trouble in translating concepts perfectly simple to the Ancient Greeks.

I cannot claim to see into the minds of either Petersen or Homer, and I do not know exactly why they chose certain techniques. This is a limitation because I am unable to make 100% accurate statements about their intentions; I can only speculate.

As Abraham Lincoln famously said, “The problem with the internet is that it is not always reliable.” Considering that I have used many internet sites to help me with my research, I acknowledge this limitation. It is possible that some of my information is incorrect because it was sourced from bad sites.

Bibliography:

No comments:

Post a Comment

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...